Precision Software & Services for the Energy Industry

Search Badleys Website

BGL Technical Notes

Fault Seal Uncertainty Analysis

Keywords: geostatistics, T7, fault seal, sensitivity, uncertainty

Abstract
A significant proportion of the world’s conventional petroleum reservoirs occur in structural traps. Therefore, understanding the controls on structural geometry and fault seal are crucial steps in modelling/predicting hydrocarbon accumulation. One of the principal mechanisms by which faults are fluid-retaining is membrane seal; this is where smeared ‘clay minerals’ form impermeable barriers along structural planes. The following study shows that estimates of fault seal can be highly sensitive to the type of methods used to model the fault rock properties. Three methods were employed: B-Spline; SGS and a combined SGS+MPS method. The results suggest that, given the same structural model and well data, the pattern of fault seal integrity along the fault plane can vary considerably depending on the method used. Furthermore, stochastic methods (SGS and SGS+MPS) illustrate how uncertainty associated with the reservoir attributes (fault rock properties) propagate through to the final fault seal model. Therefore, uncertainties in fault seal estimates are fundamentally related to uncertainty in the faulted rock properties. The use of stochastic methods also helped illustrate the point that fault seal and reservoir properties are ‘coupled’ in an inverse sense so that fault seal will improve at the expense of reservoir quality.

Download pdf

Analysing Fault Seal Capacities in Field Appraisal: A Case Study from Oseberg Syd

Keywords: T7, fault seal, Allan diagram, juxtaposition seals, shale gouge ratio, calibration

Abstract
A fault seal study has been performed on faults in the Oseberg Syd area, located within Block 30/9 of the Norwegian sector of the North Sea. The area is structurally complex and heavily compartmentalised. Despite this, almost all of the individual fault blocks that have been drilled have been found to contain oil and gas. This study attempts to achieve a better understanding of reservoir separation, fault linkage and the likelihood for seal along individual faults via detailed 3D structural modelling and fault seal analysis on 16 block-bounding faults using a commercial G&G software package (T7). The results (most strikingly illustrated by two end members: a sealing fault and a non-sealing fault) suggest that SGR values below or close to 15% correspond to no seal; SGR values between ca. 15-18% are consistent with adjacent fault blocks having small pressure differentials (< 1 bar or 30 m difference in OWC) and SGR values of>18% correspond to significant seal (8 bar pressure difference or up to 240 m difference in OWC). This SGR calibration was found to be consistent with observed fluid contacts and pressure data in all the Oseberg Syd wells. Finally, the SGR distributions for faults lacking sufficient well control points, were used to predict likely seal capacities and therefore constrain the occurrence of hydrocarbons in undrilled compartments.

Download pdf

Estimating Fault Seal and Capillary Sealing Properties in the Visund Field, North Sea

Keywords: Fault seal, shale gouge ratio, capillary seal, T7

Abstract
This study investigates the difference in seal/leakage mechanisms across the A-Central Fault, a major trap bounding fault located in the westerly dipping fault block of the Visund Field, Brent Province, North Sea. The Shale Gouge Ratio (SGR) algorithm is used to predict fault-zone composition, using subsurface mapping and petrophysical data. These data are then used to model threshold capillary pressure (Pc) and from this derive an estimate of maximum possible hydrocarbon column height. Modelling suggests that the self-juxtaposed reservoirs are likely to have poorer sealing potential and therefore across-fault leakage can occur in these regions. However, the Brent-Statfjord juxtapositions are predicted to have higher SGR, and subsequently, higher Pc and hydrocarbon column heights (predicted oil: 25-250 m or gas column: 15-150 m). Observed data confirm these suppositions.

Download pdf